Senators make bipartisan call to restore donor tax breaks

Lankford is a co-sponsor of bipartisan legislation that would extend the break to the 2022 tax year and raise the maximum deduction to around $4,000 for singles and $8,000 for couples.

Despite his general support for allowing all taxpayers to deduct charitable donations, Wyden did not sign on as co-sponsor of the Lankford bill, and he declined in a hallway interview after the hearing to say if he supported this particular approach. “I’m very committed to increasing the number of Americans who have the ability” to deduct charitable donations from their taxes, Wyden said.

Speakers at the hearing were Dan Cardinali, CEO of Independent Sector; Susannah Morgan, CEO of the Food Bank of Oregon; Una Osili, associate dean for research and international programs at Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy; and Eugene Steuerle, co-founder of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

All speakers agreed that charitable giving continues to lag behind the need for services as the pandemic drags on and other economic shocks hit the nation’s most vulnerable people.

In response to the pandemic, Congress enacted a tax break allowing people who don’t itemize their taxes to deduct charitable donations, something they previously couldn’t do. The limit was $300 for individuals and $600 for couples. This tax relief expired at the end of 2021.

While the hearing largely focused on expanding the charitable deduction, Senator Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican and former finance committee chairman who still sits on that panel, raised the issue of increased disbursements from foundations and donor-advised funds.

Grassley is a co-sponsor of a bipartisan bill that would require contributors to donor-advised funds to distribute the money to charity within 15 years to receive tax benefits. The bill also includes incentives for foundations to increase their payout to 7% of assets per year; the law currently requires a 5% disbursement rate for foundations.

Oregon Food Bank’s Morgan enthusiastically endorsed the increased payment requirements. “When I hear about rich people putting money aside to improve the future,” she said, “my response is to improve the future right now.”

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat from Rhode Island, asked about the administrative burden of payment legislation. What happens, he asked, when a donor deposits money into a donor-referred fund account and distributes some of that money each year – how does the fund manager track- he what dollars are distributed in 15 years?

“You go into a very complicated logistical tracking to determine when each dollar came in,” Whitehouse said.

Morgan replied that her nonprofit already does something similar to prevent food waste, and it’s not difficult. “We track our inventory like that,” she said. “When we get a truckload of oranges, we know when they’ve come in and when they have to come out.”


This article was provided to The Associated Press by the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Dan Parks is editor of the Chronicle. Email: The AP and the Chronicle are supported by the Lilly Endowment for coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits. The AP and the Chronicle are solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s philanthropy coverage, visit

Source link

Comments are closed.