Major corporate donors are silent on alleged Black Lives Matter personal transactions

MBig companies that put on a show cutting checks to the national Black Lives Matter group following the May 2020 police killing of George Floyd have no more say in the charity’s alleged personal dealings .

Seventeen companies that publicly pledged at least $100,000 to the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation in the days following Floyd’s killing declined to comment or did not respond to inquiries from the Washington Examiner asking if they approved of the charity’s use of their donations to secretly buy a $6 million mansion in Los Angeles and award lucrative contracts to family members and friends of BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors, who had sole control of the charity until May 2021.


Cullors said in February after several states ordered BLM to halt its fundraising operations that the charity “didn’t go out and solicit the money. … It’s from money that comes from white guilt, white corporate guilt.”

Major BLM benefactors in the days following Floyd’s murder include Amazon, which engaged $10 million in part to BLM, Microsoft, which engaged $250,000 to BLM, Coca-Cola, which make a donation $500,000 to charity and Airbnb, which also make a donation $500,000 to BLM.

Many major BLM corporate donors have issued sweeping public statements claiming that their contributions to BLM will help improve the lives of black people in the United States.

“We stand in solidarity with the black community and call for justice and change,” Ritz Crackers said in a June 2020 Tweeter announcing a $500,000 commitment to BLM. “We cannot remain silent. Each of us has a role we can play. As such, we are committed to supporting the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation and the NAACP with donations for the fight for equality racial.”

BLM released tax documents for the nonprofit in May showing it used its financial windfall to buy a $6 million Los Angeles mansion with donor funds. Cullors said she stayed at the mansion for four nights after her purchase in October 2020. She also hosted several personal parties at the mansion, including a birthday party for her child. The National Legal and Policy Center watchdog group filed a lawsuit in April against BLM alleging its mansion purchase was a clear violation of IRS law.

BLM also gave BLM Canada $8 million to help buy a mansion in Toronto that cost the equivalent of $6.3 million.

BLM paid an art company run by the father of Cullors’ only child, Damon Turner, $969,000. Cullors’ brother Paul received $840,993 from BLM for “professional security services”. Paul Cullors is best known for working as a graffiti artist before launching his security business in July 2020, according to New York Post.

BLM even paid $139,625 to its former executive director Kailee Scales despite the fact that she did not work for the charity between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021, the period covered by the form disclosure. 990.

It is unclear whether BLM’s corporate donors vetted the charity or imposed conditions on their donations before publicly promoting their financial commitments. Local black activists complained for years before Floyd’s killing that the national BLM group was not adequately supporting the movement’s grassroots activists.

BLM said in a February 2021 report that he raised $90 million in 2020 with an average donation amount of $30.64, indicating that the vast majority of his financial support came from small donors.

CharityWatch executive director Laurie Styron said the public support BLM has received from big business has likely motivated smaller donors to give to the group.

“George Floyd’s death has been treated as a global event. In the midst of this 24/7 media coverage, many companies may have jumped on the bandwagon and made a pledge or donation without subject the charity or the individuals who run it to normal due diligence procedures,” Styron told the Washington Examiner.


“As we saw with Bernie Madoff, once a few highly respected people or institutions put their money into something, it gives it credibility,” Styron added. “It can cause people to let their guard down and abandon routine due diligence. They think that if this or that company donates to this particular charity, it must have already been thoroughly vetted, so that’s a safe bet for my business or me as an individual to donate to him as well.”

“Relying on the wisdom of the crowd can sometimes have disastrous consequences, as we see here,” she said.

Source link

Comments are closed.