Who are Arabella’s major donors?

The “dark money” network created and run by Arabelle Advisors is perhaps the most powerful and, until recently, the least publicized actor in Washington politics. In just five years, this kraken has grown its revenue by 405%, from $332 million in 2015 to nearly $1.7 billion in 2020. This includes double its income since 2019.

Finding Arabella network donors is tricky. The IRS does not require 501(c)(3) nonprofits to disclose their donors, only the amounts donated, as part of Americans’ free speech rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution .

But three of the four ‘sisters’ in this ‘dark money’ family rely heavily on grants from foundations to fund their political activities, which includes funneling money from wealthy philanthropies to the controversial left-wing causes they prefer. not be directly associated.

To date, we have traced $356 million in grants to Arabella’s three (c)(3) in-house groups from a handful of major center-left donors. While most of the grants we uncovered don’t specify what cause they were intended to support, some shed light on how these foundations used Arabella’s nonprofits as a conduit to openly fund. Politics Activities.

Masked “progressivism” in philanthropy

the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is Arabella Groups’ largest donor to date, weighing in at nearly $456 million since 2008, including $127 million in 2020 alone.

the Ford Foundation gave Arabella nonprofits $25 million in 2020. Many of its grants specify public health and education as targets, but even those philanthropic-sounding goals focus on political advocacy, ” social justice” and “narrative change”.

A Ford Foundation grant provides funding for the “Ohio Transformation Fund to Advance Criminal Justice Reform and Civic Engagement,” code for voter registration and participation. Another funds “state policy advocacy, civic engagement, and strategic communications” for the Reproductive Justice First Coalition, an Arabella front that is pushing to overturn the Hyde Amendment banning the federal government from using taxpayer money to pay for abortions in most cases. The group also wants to legalize postal abortifacients to terminate pregnancies up to 10 weeks, especially in African Americans and minorities.

Another $700,000 from the Ford Foundation paid for “educating and training grassroots organizations to increase engagement. . . in the redistribution of the state. The redistricting process is inherently political because it involves legislators vying for legislative maps that favor their political party. What business does the tax-exempt Ford Foundation, which is banned from substantial political activity, have to meddle in the biggest political fight of 2022?

the Rockefeller Foundationa stalwart of the left, gave Arabella’s empire an additional $15 million, though details are unclear.

the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation donated approximately $28 million to Arabella nonprofits in 2020. Given that the foundation is Warren Buffett’s chosen vehicle to funnel billions of dollars into the pro-abortion camp, it’s likely that money supported pro-abortion groups.

Few have heard of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, but it is one of the largest funders of environmental activism in America. He’s also one of Arabella’s top donors, donating $22 million to the network last year alone. Most of that money has funded climate and conservation-related causes, including $12.8 million for the creation of a “financial hub” to educate financial institutions about “natural resource risk.” The aim is to make global warming a key part of lenders’ risk assessments in order to forcibly shift western economies into a carbon-free future – the eco-left’s plan to reshape the world in its own image misanthropic.

the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation-created by the co-founder of Hewlett-Packard-transferred $12 million to the Arabella empire in 2020. A $1 million grant was used to fund the Election fund in trustwhich I have documented as created by Big Philanthropy to help Democrats oust President Donald Trump and silence critics of the gaping integrity issues of the 2020 election.

Similarly, we traced $950,000 of the David and Lucile Packard FoundationHewlett-Packard philanthropy other co-founder.

In agreement with the distribution brands, the WK Kellogg Foundation (of breakfast cereal fame) donated about $2.5 million to Arabella Groups last year, while the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation– named after the son of a Johnson & Johnson co-founder – donated an additional $8 million.

Finally, we uncovered $10 million paid to the Arabella network since the Silicon Valley Community Foundation and nearly $120 million from Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund. Both of these nonprofits are donor-advised funders, meaning that their grants ultimately came from anonymous donors using these providers as intermediaries. Interestingly, New Venture Fund, Arabella’s flagship 501(c)(3) product, received the award from Fidelity Charitable second largest grant in its Form 990 filing.

Doubtful transparency

This all goes back to the argument we made in our first report on the Arabella Network in 2019, when it was (only) $600 million: when left-leaning donors want to quietly fund political advocacy, they turn to Arabella Advisors.

This network sent nearly $174 million in 2020 to America votes, a massive push-to-vote operation targeting Democratic voters. Is it charity?

He gave $25 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Lifewho repackaged the money as grants to government election offices across the country to privatize the 2020 elections in battleground states – is this a new form of progressive charity?

And about $91 million went from Arabella’s 501(c)(3) groups to her 501(c)(4) alone, the Sixteen Thirty Fundin 2020. How much of this foundation money ended up in the coffers of the Sixteen Thirty Fund?

The prank is over

The company claims that—to quote Sampriti Ganguli, outgoing CEO of Arabella– it’s simply a “relatively small business services organization that deals with HR, legal compliance, etc.” for the four nonprofits who mysteriously share his DC address and paid the company $45 million to manage this political juggernaut in 2020 alone.

But even the left no longer buys this line. In a recent maintenance Ganguli defends his obscure, supposedly purely philanthropic business in Atlanticwhich is hardly favorable to the conservatives.

Here are some highlights:

Green [Interviewer]: I saw in your 2020 impact report that you frequently work on “civic engagement” projects – you have awarded something like 530 grants to 290 grantees on issues such as “voter protection” and efforts to “defend democracy”. You could call this political work, with a little p. . . . Why should people with lots of money be able to do this anonymously?

Gangli: There are many actors involved in changing American civic life. I just have to be honest with you: you’re zooming in on such a small part of what Arabella Advisors does. I’m having trouble with your question.

. . .

Green: But you are sitting in this progressive universe. . . . How do you keep these ideas in your head at the same time? You spend your days serving the interests and needs of billionaires. Plus, theoretically, you’re part of a progressive world that thinks it’s wrong and unfair.

. . .

I wonder if you think it’s normal that groups like this can operate under cover of darkness.

Gangli: This is what the law allows. When the laws change, we will ensure that we comply with them perfectly. Projects and donors have every opportunity to publicly share what they are doing and not doing. It is not for Arabella Advisors to comment on what this should be.

Don’t forget that Arabella is North Fund and Sixteen Thirty Fund lobbied Congress for forced donor disclosure through the Democrats for the People Act (HR 1).

Emphatically enough, Ganguli eventually admitted that Arabella was basically the leftist equivalent of the libertarian Koch brothers:

Green: You both benefit from similar legal structures, federal regulations and the ability to invest a lot of money in politics, little p. They just work on the opposite side, for opposite causes. Do you feel good about being the left-wing equivalent of the Koch brothers?

Gangli: Yeah.

Commedia is over.


Source link

Comments are closed.